2-402(2), (2) the undisputed affidavits in the case made evanesce that the accusatory intent of the auctioneer had been to sell the safe and its contents and that the parties had reciprocally assented to such a sale of both the safe and its contents, and (3) therefore summary judgment for the dry land was improper, requiring regression to enter summary judgment for the buyers. OUTCOME: The court reversed the lower courts judgment. SUMMARY: [***1] Nature of Action: Interpleader action to determine whether an estate which located a saf e up for auction or the purchasers of the sa! fe were entitled to the cash found in a locked compartment indoors the safe. Superior Court: The Superior Court for Snohomish County, No. 78-2-02745-6, Robert C. Bibb, J., apt(p) a summary judgment in favor of the estate on January 10, 1979. Court of Appeals: The court affirmed the judgment at 26 Wn. App. 742, holding that the parties had not intended to sell the...If you requisite to get a full essay, order it on our website: OrderEssay.net
If you want to get a full information about our service, visit our page: write my essay
No comments:
Post a Comment